Monday, December 30, 2013
The Next Thursday Conundrum
Sunday, December 29, 2013
From Ross Noble to Johnny Vegas: Comedians of the Year
The best Christmas TV wasn't Christmas TV but catching up on a series I hadn't managed to see on its first or subsequent runs. Ross Noble's Freewheelin reminded me of a kind of television they generally no longer make, except, perhaps, by accident. It is TV straight from the 1980s, when Channel 4 earned its reputation for innovation by simply making room in its schedule for the unexpected. In Noble's show, he travels around the UK based on random suggestions made to him via Twitter. In one episode he even travelled as far as visiting St Helens, though I can't say I recognised the parts he visited. Unlike his visits to other towns, Noble avoided the shopping district. St Helens was portrayed as an utter dump. Perhaps it is, though that will be particularly evident if you choose to look at one derelict shop in some backstreet away from the centre of town. In a way, it was a bit of a disappointment but not unexpected. This region has a reputation and you don't often hear people talk about the famous writer, wit, or intellectual from St Helens. In the national psyche, we're the stuff of twisted rugby players, boxers with flattened senses, and the comedian Johnny Vegas. Vegas made a welcome appearance in the St Helen's episode, though I suspect that was down to his friendship with Noble rather than the producer trying to fill the show with celebrities. Unfortunately, they did that also, which was the series' one failing. The format's strength is that it actually involved real people in everyday situations which Noble warped with his brand of spontaneous comedy. It's actually gave a little attention to parts of the county that rarely get included in the TV schedules. Yet I guess it's unsurprising that even the best show should betrays its ethos by sadly conformed to the usual TV formula of replacing real people with celebrities. Does a tour of the UK always have to involve a stop off at Paul Daniel's house? It's as though a tour of the UK couldn't be complete without involving some luvvie from that other world. I've said it before that celebrities ruined Twitter but must they also ruin a TV based around Twitter. It seems that they must. The other thing I've found myself watching over Christmas are Dave's repeats of Have I Got News For You. In many respects, I agree with people who say its lots its edge and it's a show that desperately needs a revamp. If it does, I don't think it need be a huge change. Simply getting rid of the guest presenters would be a step in the right direction. By its very nature, satire is the comedy of the outsider. It's the stuff of the alternative point of view. It's why HIGNFY rightly belongs on BBC2 and not on the nation's main TV channel. Like the alternative Queen's speech, it should be about standing apart from the herd, directing scorn where scorn will sting. Now on BBC1 and hosted by many of the people it should set out to mock, the show has been co-opted by the establishment and it now rarely bites. Although I don't like the man's comedy but perhaps ideal host would be Frankie Boyle simply because he might upset a few people in the process. An even better host would be Stewart Lee, though I doubt if it would be his thing and he probably wouldn't do it anyway. The problem with so much satire in the UK is that it's become safely contained within establishment rules, appropriated by the establishment as if to control disenchantment. Gone are the days when politicians would step in to try to stop the broadcast of an episode of Spitting Image. Indeed, it's a sign of how bad satire has become that I actually miss Spitting Image, which in its later years was itself a twisted version of its former self. It also reminds me that over Christmas, I watched a biography about David Frost. Among the few things I took away from the show was the degree to which Frost was himself always destined for an establishment role. Although he made his name in satire, he wasn't by nature satirical or, for that matter, either a writer or performer. The great Peter Cook was said to have resented the way Frost took the Fringe out of theatres and put it on TV. It's why I hope Ross Noble remains on the outside of that world. I hope he manages to stay disconnected from the London establishment. I had worried that Johnny Vegas might have become 'too London'. When Noble met him, he was in a London pub, hundreds of miles away from where his career began in the St Helens Citadel. Then I read about him laying into the establishment at the typically woeful British Comedy Awards. You need to skip to four minutes to get the meat of the business… Of course, part of this might just have been his usual shtick and I worry that the London set laugh because of the way he says things rather than the things he says. But what he says has real significance to me given I spend most of my days lamenting about the state of comedy writing in the UK.
Is it any surprise that the elected king and queen of British comedy should be Jack Whitehall and Miranda Hart? It makes me even more jaded and I have even less desire to write comedy or drawn cartoons, hence the reason I've spent most of my time over Christmas drawing bad caricatures on my upgraded Note. I don't think I've ever been this frustrated in my own work, when my writing, typified by my Stan book, gets nowhere but two extremely unfunny but establishment figures are lauded as comic geniuses. It sickens me to watch Miranda claim Eric Morecambe as her own, somehow associating her mediocre talent to his unequaled star. I suppose it frustrates me that Johnny Vegas is laughed off as if he's the eccentric uncle spoiling the party when he's actually speaking truths from the heart that should be acknowledged as wisdom. If I've been critical of Vegas in the past, I suppose it was out of my own sense of frustration that my local area should be associated with the Vegas character. It seemed to play into all the southern prejudices that people around here are uneducated, boorish, and borderline alcoholic. Yet Michael Pennington has more humour talent in his little finger than Whitehall has displayed in his entire career. Whitehall, however, is the son of Michael Whitehall and there you have the truth of the world. So, for that one moment of sublime genius, Vegas wins my vote for comedian of the year. Not that it matters. Wednesday, December 25, 2013
Reflections on Christmas
Saturday, December 21, 2013
Freeing Up Drive C
A glance at the list of files at the top told me it that it was a file called hiberfil.sys, which I immediately suspected had something to do with Windows hibernation, which I never use. I have 16Gb in this machine so a snapshot of my memory at any one time would probably amount to a 12Gb file. Anyway, a quick Google search told me that I could delete the file and easier than I thought. Find your Command Prompt in the Accessories menu. Select it with a right mouse click and choose 'Open as Administrator'. Then type the following at the prompt. powercfg -h off And just like that, the file disappeared and I now have a glorious 12Gb free on my drive. For months I've been working with a few hundred megabytes of free space so today feels like my birthday. 12Gb! I feel almost dizzy with excitement. Friday, December 20, 2013
Bloody Collect+
Deceived By The Delivery: The Graeme Swann Controversy
So Graeme Swann has been forced to apologise by anti-rape campaigners after he compared England's Ashes defeat to being 'arse raped' by the Australians. Had he said 'butt fucked' I suppose it wouldn't have landed him in such hot water or, for that matter, on such a tricky wicket. Yet perhaps it would… It sometimes feels like we live in a hyper-connected (and hyper-sensitive) age, where certain keywords muttered in one place trigger automated responses elsewhere designed to advance the cause of whichever group believes they have ownership of that particular word, phrase or concept. A high profile figure uses the word 'rape' in an offhand manner and it's no longer surprising when an advocacy group takes the chance to highlight the evils of rape. Had Swann said 'corn holed', representatives of the corn industry might have taken offence... But perhaps that's a glib thing to say. I'm prone to say glib things that might offend, which is perhaps why this story attracts my attention. Thankfully, I'm not an oft-lauded English off-spin bowler so nobody will really care what I say, glib or otherwise. Before my meaning can be misconstrued, however, let me state here that I believe rape to be the most horrific violation of not just the body but the human spirit. In many ways, it is a crime worse than murder, so what follows is not a defence of rapists or an attempt to degrade the significance of their crime. What interests me is the degree to which we are allowed to use these words and concepts in our everyday language. At what point does a subject become too taboo for the idle quip? You see, I feel a little sorry for Swann. Swann is an easy target and he's in no position to defend his use of the phrase. He is speaking in a way that's familiar in a certain context. It's the kind of quip often exchanged between male friends, the sort of vulgar joke that might include some reference to the film 'Deliverance' and the phrase 'squeal like a pig'. It's not sophisticated humour. Nor is it humour that will appeal to everyone. Taken out of one context and placed into another, it will easily offend people who don't share that sensibility. But it's a type of humour that is out there and is so very recognisable. Of course, Graeme Swann doesn't say any of this. It's easier for Swann to say 'sorry' and move on than it is for him to defend his right to use whatever language he feels appropriate when posting to his brother's Facebook page. And, really, is there anything he can say that sounds as meaningful as the words of Yvonne Traynor, the chief executive of Rape Crisis, who told The Telegraph: "We are appalled that Graeme Swann equates a cricket match with the devastatingly serious crime of rape. It is the duty of a people in the public eye to make sure that their own distorted views are kept to themselves and not shared with the general public. These comments lack compassion and intelligence and he should apologise to anyone who has suffered from this heinous crime."The problem I have is the problem I have whenever an offhand remark is countered with a well-considered response. Anybody can make an offhand remark which can then be made to look foolish with an acutely reasoned reply. Somebody well practised at deconstructionism could take many a mild statement and expose some raw misogyny, fascist leaning or underlying assumption about other people and their cultures. We routinely use words to express ourselves which come laden with all kinds of prior meanings but that isn't to say that we advocate the murder of the French whenever we say that somebody has 'met their Waterloo' any more than there's an implied support of colonialism when we say 'I could murder a curry'. So if there has been no reasonable defence made for Graeme Swann, then I think there should be one. There should be a reasoned argument that says something like: 'obviously, he didn't mean to offend anybody who has suffered that most terrible crime of rape, but he used an example of extreme human barbarity to express the profound disappointment he's feeling at the moment.' It should go on as follows: 'Rather than diminish the severity of rape, his comment acknowledges rape's status as an ultimate taboo in our collective morality. Much of our humour comes from exploring these taboo concepts and his remarks belonged to a long tradition of using such terms for darkly comic effect (see Freud's Totem and Taboo). Of course, rape exists and it will continue to exist as long as individuals seek to impose their will on other individuals. It is part of all human potential and, sadly, it will always be part of the sum total of what we call "the human condition". Yet to hide it away and restrict our use of the word for only those moments when we're talking seriously about something is wrong and denies us an important part of our language.' But, of course, if that's reasonably put, it's also reasonable to say that there is a point at which such comparisons become unacceptable. Swann could have said 'murdered' by the Australians and it wouldn't have raised any objection. Had he compared it with ethic cleaning or, even worse, been so specific as to compare it to the Holocaust, he would have been rightly vilified. There might, then, be a matter of degree in this situation. 'Bummed', 'buggered' or even 'butt fucked' wouldn't have raised such alarm. 'Rape', however, is such a sensitive subject and in some sense politicised, he should have known better than to walk down the middle of the wicket wearing his spikes and cutting up the rough. Because, to some, making supposedly funny remarks about rape is tantamount to attempting to reduce the seriousness of the crime. They argue that we desensitise ourselves to the violence of rape by using the word in such a casual manner. And I suppose there might be that danger. The old saying that 'familiarity breeds contempt' has established wisdom about it. We live in a world where it is increasingly difficult to be shocked. Films have developed such an elaborate language of horror that it's hard to think of something that exceeds the imaginations of filmmakers. Saw was a shocking movie but tame compared to what came later. The 'unimaginable' horrors of films of the 1950s are laughable compared to today's torture horror. In another fifty years, what might that generation think about today's Human Centipede? Yet whatever they think about our horror, I doubt if future generations will have any more developed response to rape. There is a difference between styles of horror and certain depictions of physical violence. Whilst the sight of Norman Bates' mother, at the end of Psycho, has lost much of its shock value, the same can't be said of rape scenes from films of the 1960s and 70s. A Clockwork Orange still makes for very uncomfortable viewing as does Straw Dogs. One of the most shocking and uncomfortable films I've seen which still shocks today is Hitchcock's Frenzy. There is something about the act of rape that isn't lessened by familiarity or overuse of the word. It simply never fails to shock. I've laboured longest over the wording of this brief article than I've done over anything in a long time. The very fact that it makes for uncomfortable discussion and there's been little or no debate about a cricketer's use of the term would suggest that it retains its power. Horror has its basis in some part of the brain that's unconnected with our moral actions. Rape remains the ultimate violation, utterly taboo, a place reserved for the worst things that humans can do to one another. And in this respect, Swann's remarks belong to that category of darkly humourous exaggeration we use as a way of commentating on something so out of the ordinary. Is it too much of a stretch to say that it was used in the same way that Alexander Pope meant it when he wrote 'Rape of the Lock'? Well, perhaps it is. Times change and perhaps Swann was unwise to use the word in what might be thought of as a public forum. He might have used the word unthinkingly (but I don't think it was as unthinking as some would wish). Yet if Swann's choice of expression was shocking, some might say it was shockingly funny but shocking nevertheless. And that is how it should be and, in that sense, I don't believe he has any reason to apologise. Just to suggest that he uses it in a way that's disrespectful of all rape victims is to play unfair games with language. It plays politics with the issue by spinning the spinner's words.
Wednesday, December 18, 2013
Dreaming of Tom Waits
I met Tom Waits in my dreams last night. It was the first night I'd slept soundly, undisturbed by the coughing that's characterised the latter days of my heavy cold. Waits was at his charismatic best, performing a duet with David Bowie in a clever video which I can't entirely remember but was one part hobo chic and another part travelling balloon carnival. After the song, Waits took to the stage and I was sitting near the front, feeling blessed that I had an opportunity to see my very favourite musician up close. Then he started to hand out free albums and magic beans and the whole thing got crazy. I can't remember much of the show except it seemed to involve driving old 1930s cars through a corn field as a dwarf accompanied him on the sousaphone. After the performance, I had chance to meet Waits and I reached out to shake his hand. I thought his hand was small. Perhaps I'd shaken hands with the dwarf instead. I'll never know. We got to talking about the topless brunette sitting in the Model T Ford and that's when the telephone rang and I woke up. Sleep, I think, is important to me. Or at least, dreaming seems to be key to the way my brain functions in the day. I've been struggling to come up with good cartoon ideas for the past week, which I think confirms my suspicions that my imagination is tied to getting a solid eight hours. Today I'm supposed to start work on one of the websites I'll be building instead of enjoying Christmas this year but I also intend to make some room in my afternoon for some serious cartooning. The lack of time and ideas to cartoon is particularly galling because on Saturday I took the bold step and upgraded my Samsung Note. I'd found a buyer for my relatively new Samsung 10.1, meaning that I took next to no financial hit when it came to buying the newer 2014 edition I've been talking about for so long. I did the deed at the John Lewis store in Liverpool with a little of the money I'd made from my animation project. The whole experience has been a bit unsettling, given that the first Note had quickly become as useful as my right arm. I'm still not completely at home with the new Note, though that's partly down to my ordering a case from Amazon that is now going back. I originally ordered one of these, a beautiful case but with major flaws. The magnet in the lid is meant to wake the Note when you open it and shut it down when you close it. This it does but it also shuts down the Note when you fold the lid all the way back, as you do when holding it to draw. The same magnet (I suspect it's just too powerful) also infers with the magnetic field that S Pen uses to locate its location on the screen, meaning that if you happen to draw in the same spot where the magnet's located at the back, you have a dead spot on the screen. I've now bought the same type of case as I had on my original Note and hope that things improve. The reason I wanted the newer Note was to draw on the 4k canvasses supported by Art Flow and the experience so far hasn't made me regret my decision. I think my few scribbled test cartoons are already looking crisper and the whole drawing experience is much improved, with smoother operation and no lag between my hand and the screen. The only problem is a bug in Art Flow which means I can't export the canvasses to Photoshop. I emailed the developer and apparently he's working on a fix. Tomorrow, I'll post the results, if there are any results and my brain starts functioning again. I suppose the fear I always live with is that one day I'll wake up and I'm no longer able to think of a funny joke or a funny cartoon. I fear that one day I might wake up to discover that I've grown up and become fascinated by tax and the brain rotting seriousness you find among the comment section of The Guardian. I worry that I'll become one of those serious people when all I want is to be like Tom Waits, casting glitter over the heads of the midget tumblers and brunettes in classic cars. Tuesday, December 17, 2013
Getting in the silverskins
Monday, December 16, 2013
The Monday After the Month Before
Wednesday, December 11, 2013
Damn, Hell and Bugger!
Tuesday, December 10, 2013
John W Henry: The Cartoon Strip – Episode 5
Saturday, December 07, 2013
A Slow Burning Tragedy Courtesy of the NHS
Thursday, November 28, 2013
Brainwashing & Bestiality: The British Shopping Experience
- "Keep the person unaware of what is going on and how attempts to psychologically condition him or her are directed in a step-by-step manner.
- Control the person's social and/or physical environment; especially control the person's time.
- Systematically create a sense of powerlessness in the person.
- Manipulate a system of rewards, punishments and experiences in such a way as to inhibit behavior that reflects the person's former social identity.
- The group manipulates a system of rewards, punishments, and experiences in order to promote learning the group's ideology or belief system and group-approved behaviors.
- Put forth a closed system of logic and an authoritarian structure that permits no feedback and refuses to be modified except by leadership approval or executive order."
Tuesday, November 26, 2013
Still Here
Sunday, November 24, 2013
The blog post in which I reflect on how I'm not making much progress
Friday, November 22, 2013
On Stu, Elberry, Michael and Me
Tuesday, November 19, 2013
A Blog Post That Makes Me Feel Queasy Just By Posting It
Sunday, November 17, 2013
No Time
Friday, November 15, 2013
The Little Old Lady in Boots
Thursday, November 14, 2013
Yet another pointless debate about social immobility among the very people causing it
Wednesday, November 13, 2013
Worst Blog Post Ever
It disappoints me when I don't blog. I didn't want to miss another day for precisely that reason. I had a hellish weekend and it annoys me that I've not drawn a gag cartoon in nearly two weeks. Monday and Tuesday, I was busy/distracted/worn out by a variety of jobs that needed doing. I had people to see, places to go, and blogs I didn't have time to write. In my various travels, I did get to hold the new Samsung Note 10.1 (2014 edition) and it was a beautiful as I thought it would be. Somewhat annoyingly, had I waited, various offers might have made it less than the price of my current tablet.
In other news: lost a spoke on my bike and it's next to impossible to find a place to replace it at a decent price. Can't do it myself because spokes have to be right length, down the millimetre.
Still no word about cartoon competitions. I guess it has been announced. I'm not looking and I have to stop even mentioning them.
The only positive is that I've managed to make a little progress on my promotional video.
Okay, this was definitely my worst blog post ever. I'll try to do better tomorrow. Meanwhile, here are some strange shots I took after I discovered the panoramic function of my phone. For some of these, I Just held the camera to the window as the train moved and the camera did its magic. I think they came out looking surprisingly reasonable.
Monday, November 11, 2013
The Monday Carton
Sunday, November 10, 2013
You're Now Entering... The Comfort Zone
Saturday was a day of two emotions. I sat down at one point to make headway on a project I've just started for an American startup. As soon as I sat down and focussed my mind on the task at hand (animating a tree so it sways gently in the breeze), I felt my body relax. My tensions eased and the things that have been preoccupying me in the past week just disappeared. I was actually happy. The alternative was my other work which preoccupied the rest of my day. I was like a caged beast grinding down my teeth on iron bars. I suppose more than anything I was struggling with myself. The problem comes down to this: I don't want to install Skype on my PC. It sounds such a dumb thing to get agitated about but I hate Skype. I hate the way it lurks, ready to spring into life. I hate the presumption that I want to be connected with hundreds of smiling people, all with great teeth and feeling so damn happy. I hate Messenger too, though I've very reluctantly installed it. I hate that it sits next to me when I'm working. I dislike the way it informs the world when I'm sitting at my desk and when I'm away. I can, of course, make myself 'invisible' but then why have the foul machinery installed in the first place? And what business is it of other people if I am sitting at my desk, if I'm working or idle? Yet if I accept that Messenger is a good way to communicate, then Skype is a step too far. I hate phones, generally dislike mobile phone culture which increasingly cuts us off from the people around us. Phones also break my concentration, allow devious bastards like marketing agencies to bother me. Generally I don't have them in my room. I'm also not one of life's great small talkers. I have too many interesting things I could be doing rather than discussing the weather. Yet as much as I don't want it, I'm told that I must have Skype. I thought I'd install it on my iPad so I can at least turn it off when I'm working… Except, it seems that's not enough. I need Skype on my PC so I can be watched as I work. Skype will allow others to see my desktop and others want to instruct me, guide my hand so I'd just be a lump of unthinking meat responding to commands and moving a cursor around a screen. Yet I'm so damn truculent that I can't accept that. I'm stubborn. This is beginning to feel intrusive. My PC sits in my office which is my studio, my work environment, my writing den, my home. In this space, I have peace and I can think and I can write. I'd want to install Skype on my PC in the same way that I'd want to install a karaoke machine in the corner of the room and purchase a series of sweat soaked drunken Japanese businessmen, one for each day of the week, to take turns singing Barry Manilow classics when I'm trying to write. Yet I must be wrong. Doesn't everybody use Skype? Why must I be so damn difficult? Why can't I just say yes? Why must I stand by my principles? Still agitated by all this, I then receive an email directing me to this video on the website www.addicted2success.com. I'm told I must watch it. It will 'help me'. I'm not entirely sure how it would help me or even if I need help. I appreciate that somebody wants to help me but I watched about a minute of this video and wanted to stick my fist through the computer screen. When I agreed to do this work, I didn't agree to have my psychology tested and changed. I don't want to be a different person. Other than wanting some success in my writing and cartooning, I'm actually quite happy being me. But why don't I just conform? Why do I want to scream at the top of my lungs: I fucking hate self-help gurus promising instant abs, popularity, and success with the ladies? Sending me a video of this kind is like hanging a red rag before a bull. They promise me money and fame and to change my life but I despise every smiling grifting one of them. They're charlatans, they're goons feeding on the vulnerable, offering instant fix solutions to age old existential problems that Sartre, Nietzsche, Schopenhauer, Socrates and Plato couldn't solve. Yet Bob's solved it and Bob's bought himself a luxury house in Florida. And Bob's success could be your success too… The tradition of snake oil salesmen is as old as most countries, strongest in American folklore. The Magnificent Oz was the prime example but American culture is steeped in their tales popularized by writers such as Mark Twain. These days, it's harder for these chancers to sell snake oil. They have to find other ways to promise rewards in exchange for magic. Many of them become SEO experts and the purveyors of that most miraculous magic of all: success at social networking. Others peddle business theory, advice on how to be a great manager. They always talk about teams and positivity, as though it were that easy to dismiss the essential individual yearnings of each of us. I've never believed in any of it and it saddens me that other people believe in it. Taking this kind of bad advice destroys many young companies. It's the reason why group meetings usually involve people sitting around feeling uncomfortable and refusing to speak. Ask anybody in one of those meetings what they want to do and they'll either say 'go home' or at least get on with their work. My last job was made difficult by the same kind of micromanagement that ultimately demoralized the staff. Always told to be a team and be motivated, nobody would actually pull their weight because they knew that anything they did would ultimately be criticized and changed. So they did nothing and eventually the business folded. None of which solves my problem today except I'm going back to animating my tree in my comfort zone. Saturday, November 09, 2013
John W Henry: The Cartoon Strip – Episode 4





